Marine Biodiversity Management from the Global Commons: Analysing the Expanded Scope of Common Heritage of mankind Principle
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
‘Our Common Future, Managing The Commons’ In Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, UN, 1987. accessed 2 January 2025.
Agreement under the UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction, Para 8, A/CONF.232/2023/4,2023. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N23/177/28/PDF/N2317728.pdf?OpenElement.
ALEX D., Rogers. and others, ‘Marine Genetic Resources in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: Promoting Marine Scientific Research and Enabling Equitable Benefit Sharing’ v. 8 Frontiers in Marine Science, 2021.
ANDREA, Capurso. The End of Res Communes Omnium’ In Falcon Marco, and Mattia Milani (Eds.) A New Role for Roman Taxonomies in the Future of Goods? Atti del convegno di Padova, 2022.
ANNA, Deplazes-Zemp. Genetic resources’, An Analysis of a Multifaceted Concept, v. 222, Biological Conservation, 2018.
Babatunde Abidoye, and others, ‘The Origin and Progress of the Sustainable Development Goals’ In Sheryl L, and others (Eds.) Handbook on Public Policy and Food Security, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024.
BASLAR, Kemal. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998.
Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, 6th Edition, Black, H.C., St. Paul, West Publ., 1990.
BLASIAK, Robert. and others, ‘Blue paper 4: The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources’ Report prepared for the (Norwegian) Prime Minister’s High-Level Panel on a sustainable Ocean Economy (World resource Institute 2020.
BLEUENN, Guilloux. Marine Genetic Resources, R&D and the Objects of Use, John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
BORDEAU, P.M and FASELLA A.T.(eds.) Environmental Ethics: Man’s Relationship with Nature Interactions with Science, Office for Official Publications for the European Community, 1990.
BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of Public International Law, Fifth edition, Clarendon Press 1998.
CARL AUGUST, Fleischer. The International Concern for the Environment: The Concept of the Common Heritage’ in Bothe, M. (Ed.) Trends in Environmental Policy and Law IUCN, 1980.
CASSESE, A., International Law in a Divided World, Clarendon, OUP, 1986.
CHARLOTTE, Ku. The concept of res communis in international law, v. 12 History of European Ideas, n. 4, 1990.
CHATTOPADHYAY, Subir K., ‘Equity in International Law: Its Growth and Development’ (1975) 5 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.384.
CHENG, B., and others, Towards the production of high levels of eicosapentaenoic acid in transgenic plants: The effects of different host species, genes and promoters, v. 19 Transgenic Res., 2010.
CHRISTOL, C., Space Law: Past, Present, and Future, Kluwer Law and Taxation,1991.
CHRISTOPHER, Joyner. Antarctica and the Law of the Sea, Martinus Nijhoff 1992.
COCCA, A.A., ‘Mankind as a New Legal Subject: A New Judicial Dimension Recognized by the United Nations’ 1972 Proc. 13th Coll. on the Law of Outer Space.
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of May 14, 1954
Convention on Biological Diversity (adopted 5 June 1992, entered into force 29 December 1993) 1760 UNTS 79 (CBD).
Declaration of Principles Governing the Seabed and the Ocean Floor, and the Subsoil Thereof, beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, UN Doc A/RES/2749(XXV) (17 December 1970). 2749(XXV) (17 December 1970).
DINGWALL, J., International law and corporate actors in deep seabed mining, Oxford University Press, 2021.
Duncan French, Common Concern, in Michael Handbook in Biodiversity Law, Edward Elgar, 2016.
Edward Guntrip, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind: An Adequate Regime for Managing the Deep Seabed?, v. 4 Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2003.
ESPOSITO, Roberto. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
FENNEL, Lee Anne. Commons, Anticommons, Semicommons’ in Kenneth Ayotte and Henry E. Simith (eds.) Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law, p. 35, Edward Elgar, 2011.
GA Official Records, 22nd session (1967), First Committee Meeting, 1 November, 1967, UN Doc. A/C.1/PV.1515.
GABRIEL, Englander. Property rights and the protection of global marine resources’ (2019) v. 2, Nature Sustainability n. 10, 2019.
GASTON, Kevin J. and SPICER, John I. Biodiversity: An Introduction, Blackwell Publishers, 2004.
Geneva Convention on the High Seas and Article 89 UNCLOS) and outer space (see UNGA Resolutions 1962 (XVII), 1721 (XVI), and 1884 (XVIII)
GHANASHYAM, Sharma, and Pradhan, Bharat Kumar, Exploring Traditional Knowledge: Bio-Prospecting and Biopiracy in India and Southeast Asian Mega-Diversity Nations, In Biodiversity and Business, Springer, Cham, p. 447- 483, 2024.
GILLES, Boeuf. Marine Biodiversity Characteristics v. 334 (5-6) Comptesrendusbiologies n. 5-6, 2011.
GLASBY, G. P., ‘Deep Seabed Mining: Past Failures and Future Prospects, v. 20, Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, n. 2, 2002.
Goldie, L.F.E., ‘A Note on Some Diverse Meanings of the Common Heritage of Mankind, v. 10, Syracuse J. Int’l, Law and Commerce, 1983.
GOROVE, S., Concept of Common Heritage of Mankind: A Political Moral or Legal Innovation, v. 9 San Diego L. Rev. 1971.
HALL, Charles. Institutional Solutions for Governing the Global Commons: Design Factors and Effectiveness. v. 7, The Journal of Environment & Development, n. 2, 1998.
HARDIN, Garrett, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ in Thinking About the Environment Routledge, 2015.
HARLAN, J. R., ‘Our Vanishing Genetic Resources’ v. 188 Science 1975.
HEY, Ellen. ‘International Institutions’ in Daniel Bodansky and others (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, 2008.
HUGHES, Kevin A., and PAUL D., Bridge. Potential impacts of Antarctic bioprospecting and associated commercial activities upon Antarctic science and scientists, v. 10 Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, n. 1, 2010.
HUMPHRIES, F., and others, ‘A Tiered Approach to the Marine Genetic Resource Governance Framework under the Proposed UNCLOS Agreement for Biodiversity Beyond National jurisdiction (BBNJ), v. 122 Marine Policy , 2020.
IMPERATIVES, Strategic. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future 42,427, 1987.
JAECKEL, A., Ardron, J. A., & Gjerde, K. M., ‘Sharing Benefits of the Common Heritage of Mankind - Is the Deep seabed Mining Regime Ready?’ v. 70 Marine Policy, 2016.
JAMES, Anaya, S. Indigenous peoples in international law, Second Edition OUP, 2004.
JANIS, Mark W., ‘The Ambiguity of Equity in International Law’ (1983) 9 Brook. J. Int'l L.7.
JOELI, Veitayaki. Traditional Marine Resource Management Practices used in the Pacific Islands: An Agenda for Change, v. 37, Ocean & Coastal Management n. 1, 1997.
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, (Sixth Indian Reprint, Universal Law Publishing Company, p. 8, 2013.
JOHN, Kish. The Law of International Spaces, Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, p. 60, 1973.
JOYNER, Christopher C., The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law’ (1999) v. 615, Emory Int’l L.Review n. 13, 1999.
JULIA D., Sigwart, and others, ‘Unlocking the potential of marine biodiscovery’, v. 38(7) Natural Product Reports n.7, 2021.
KISS, Alexandrer. The Common Heritage of Mankind: Utopia or Reality?’ (1985) v. 40 (3) International Journal, n. 3, 1985.
LATHE, W., J., and others, Genomic Data Resources: Challenges and Promises, v.1, Nature Education n. 3, 2008.
LEE A., Kimball. International Ocean Governance: Using International Law and Organizations to Manage Marine Resources Sustainably, IUCN, 2003.
LEFEBER, R., ‘The Exercise of Jurisdiction in the Common Interest’ (1990) 21 NYIL 113.
LOUGHLIN, Martin. The Idea of Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
MARELLA, Maria Rosaria. The commons as a legal concept, v. 28 Law and Critique, 2017.
MARGERY L., Oldfield. The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources (US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1984.
MARIA ROSARIA, Marella. The commons as a legal concept v. 28 Law and Critique, 2017.
MCGRAW, Désirée M., ‘The CBD- Key Characteristics and Implications for Implementation’ (2002) 11 Rev. Eur. Comp. & Int'l Envtl. L. P. 17, 2002.
Michael Bowman, Peter Davies and Edward Goodwin (eds), Research Handbook in Biodiversity Law, Edward Elgar, 2016.
MILUN, Kathryn. The Political Uncommons: The Cross-cultural Logic of the Global Commons, Ashgate 2011.
Moratorium resolution, GA Res. 2574D (XXIV), 15 December 1969
Official Records, UNCLOS, first plenary meeting, UN Doc A/CONF.13/SR.1, p. 3, 1958.
Perruso, Richard, ‘The Development of the Doctrine of Res Communes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe’, 70 TijdschriftvoorRechtsgeschiedenis, 2002.
Piece, Thematic Think, Global Governance and Governance of the Global Commons in the Global Partnership for Development Beyond 2015’, UN System Task Team on the Post 2015 UN Development Agenda, 2013.
PM, Wijkman. Managing the global commons, v. 36 International Organization n.3, 1982. accessed 31 December 2024.
PUSHPANGADAN, P., GEORGE, V., IJINU, T.P. and CHITHRA, M.A., Biodiversity, Bioprospecting, Traditional Knowledge, v. 7 Journal of Traditional Medicine & Clinical Naturopathy, n.1, 2018.
RAO, M.B. and GURU, Manjula. Biotechnology, IPRs and Biodiversity, Pearson Longman 2007.
RAUSSER, Gordon C., and Arthur A. Small., ‘Valuing Research Ideas: Bioprospecting and the Conservation of Genetic Resources’ v. 108 Journal of Political Economy, n. 1, 2000.
RAYNER, S., Governance and the global commons, London: Pinter, 1995.
REID, Colin T. and NSOH, Walters, The Privatisation of Biodiversity? New Approaches to Conservation Law Edward Elgar Publishing,Inc., 2016.
Report of the Chair of the Legal and Technical Commission on the work of the Commission at the first part of its twenty-sixth session (9 March 2020), ISA Doc. ISBA/26/C/12 , 2020.
Resolution 2749 (XXV), Resolutions adopted on the reports of the First Committee, Declaration of Principles Governing the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor, and the Subsoil thereof, beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, 1933rd plenary meeting, 17 December 1970.
ROBERT Blasiak, and others, ‘Corporate Control and Global Governance of Marine Genetic Resources’ (2018) 4(6) v. 4, Science advances n. 6, 2018.
ROGER D., Congleton. Governing the global environmental commons: the political economy of international environmental treaties and institutions, 2001.
ROGERS, A. D., and others, Marine Genetic Resources in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: Promoting Marine Scientific Research and Enabling Equitable Benefit Sharing, v. 8 Frontiers in Marine Science, 2021.
RUTH, Lapidoth. Equity in international law, v. 22, Israel Law Review n. 2, p. 169-171, 1987.
SCHRIJVER, Nico. Managing the Global Commons: Common Good or Common Sink? v. 37 Third World Quarterly n.7, 2016.
SHEN, Hao. A Critical Assessment of the ISA’s Implementation of the CHM Principle from the Perspective of Benefit-Sharing Regime, v. 23 Int Environ Agreements, 2023.
SIMCOCK, The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment, World Ocean Assessment I, UN, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
SIMMA, Bruno. Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner, v. 20 EJIL, 2009.
SOHN, Louis B, ‘Equity in International law’ In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), v. 82, American Society of International Law, 1988.
SORESSA M., Kitessa, and others. DHA-containing Oilseed: A Timely Solution for the Sustainability Issues Surrounding Fish Oil Sources of the Health-Benefitting Long-Chain Omega-3 Oils,v.6 Nutrients n. 5, 2014.
STEINBERG, Philip E. The Social Construction of the Ocean, Vol. 78, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
TC Sandars, The institutes of Justinian. Longmans, Green (trans.) (Seventh edition, Long Mans, Green, and Co. Newyork and Bombay, Google Books 1900.
THAMBISETTY, Siva. ‘Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (Intellectual) Property Heuristics in Marine Biodiversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ 24 Center for Oceans Law and Policy.
The Antarctic Treaty (adopted 1 December 1959, entered into force 23 June 1961) 402 UNTS 71.
The Antarctic Treaty, 23 June 1962, 5778 UNTS 402.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Annex III Article 15 of the Convention; 1994 Implementation Agreement, Annex
UN Conference on the law of the sea, Plenary meetings, Official records, Volume II, 1958.
UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, 1972 Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, 1972.
UN Res 1803 (XVII) (1962),
UNGA Res ‘Development of an ILBI under the UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of ABNJ (19 June 2015) UN Doc A/RES/69/292 [1(a)]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (adopted 9 May 1992, entered into force 21 March 1994) 1771 UNTS 107 (UNFCCC) preamble, recital 1.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (adopted 9 May 1992.
Vierros, M., and others, ‘Who Owns the Ocean? Policy Issues Surrounding Marine Genetic Resources’ v. 25 Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, n.2, 2016.
WHITE, Lynn. The Historical Roots in Our Ecologic Crisis’ in Garrett de Bell (ed.) Environmental Handbook, Ballentine Books Inc., 1970.
WILLAERT, K., ‘Effective Protection of the Marine Environment and Equitable Benefit Sharing in the Area: Empty Promises or Feasible Goals?, v. Ocean Development & International Law, n.2, 2020.
WOLFRUM, R., (Ed.) ‘Celestial Bodies’ In Encyclopaedia of Public International Law: Law of the Sea and Air Space (Vol. 11 Max Plank Institute, 2013,
YPSITA, Demunshi, and CHUGH, Archana. Role of traditional knowledge in marine bioprospecting, Biodiversity and Conservation, n. 19, 2010.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, [1969] I.C.J. 3.
Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway), [1951] I.C.J. 116.
Chorzow Factory Case, [1927] P.C.I.J., ser. A, No. 9.
Serbian and Brazilian Loans Cases, [1929] P.C.I.J., ser. A, Nos. 20, 21.
Diversion of Water from the Meuse Case, [1937] P.C.I.J., ser. A/B, No. 70.
Venezuelan Preferential Case (Germany v. Venezuela), Hague Court Reports (Scott) 55 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1904). Orinoco Steamship Company Case (United States v. Venezuela).
Hague Court Reports (Scott) 226 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1910).
North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case (Great Britain v. United States), 11 U.N.R.I.A.A. 167 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1910).
Island of Palmas Case (Netherlands v. United States), 2 U.N.R.I.A.A. 829 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928).
Cayuga Indians Case
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v22i2.9859
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)
Desenvolvido por:
